Court Exhibit·31 JAN 2018
Turn Your Mission Into A Moat
When you can't outspend competitors, out-trust them — moral high ground is a strategic asset, not a slogan.
Source document — Musk v. Altman (OpenAI) — Docket 351-47 · Musk v. Altman (OpenAI) · 4:24-cv-04722 (CAND), Doc. 379-79, filed 2026-01-06
Excerpt · In Greg Brockman's own words
My view is that the best future will come from a major expansion of OpenAI. Our goal and mission are fundamentally correct, and that will increasingly be a superpower as AGI grows near.
Our fundraising conversations show that Ilya and I are able to convince reputable people that AGI can really happen in the next <=10 years, there's appetite for donations from those people, and there's very large appetite for investments from those people.
Over the next 3 years, we must build 3 things: Custom AI hardware, a massive AI data center, and the best software team, mixing between algorithm development, public demonstrations, and safety. We also have identified a small but finite number of limitations in today's deep learning which are barriers to learning from human levels of experience. And we believe we uniquely are on trajectory to solving safety (at least in broad strokes) in the next three years.
Our biggest tool is the moral high ground. To retain this, we must try our best to remain a non-profit — AI is going to shake up the fabric of society, and our fiduciary duty should be to humanity. We need to communicate a 'better red than dead' outlook — we're trying to build safe AGI, and we're not willing to destroy the world in a down-to-the-wire race to do so. We must also engage with government to provide trusted, unbiased policy advice, and be perceived as a place that provides public good to the research community.
The daily letter · Free
This edition is for members — but the daily letter is free.
One real corporate email, and the lesson it teaches, in your inbox every weekday morning. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.
How this surfaced
- Source type
- Court Exhibit
- Case / record
- Musk v. Altman (OpenAI)
- Citation
- 4:24-cv-04722 (CAND), Doc. 379-79, filed 2026-01-06
- Date authored
- January 31, 2018
- License
- Public domain
- Original
- View the primary source →
More from Elon Musk
Elon Musk & Andrej Karpathy ·OpenAI ·1 FEB 2018
Open Research Without Scale Feeds Your Competitor
If you can't match a giant's scale, publishing your best ideas is a subsidy to them, not a strategy against them.
Ilya Sutskever ·OpenAI ·1 JAN 2018
Ilya Sutskever Writes Elon Musk a New Year's Note from Inside OpenAI
Written just weeks before Musk's departure from the OpenAI board, this note captures a moment of genuine collegiality between two figures who would later become adversaries in court.
Elon Musk & Ilya Sutskever ·OpenAI ·13 SEP 2017
Design Board Math Before You Need It
Control isn't a feeling — it's a seat count, and smart founders draw the arithmetic before the fight, not during it.
Anthony Levandowski & Suzy Sammons ·Uber ·28 MAR 2017
Levandowski and Uber Coordinate Messaging Days Before His Firing
This internal email captures Anthony Levandowski, at the center of the most significant trade-secret lawsuit in autonomous-vehicle history, calmly dividing talking points with Uber colleagues just weeks before he was pushed out of the company.
Travis Kalanick & David Drummond ·Uber / Google ·7 MAR 2015
When Your Partner Stops Taking Meetings, Believe the Silence
A calendar tells you more about a partnership than any press release ever will.
Ed Baker & Jessica E. Lessin ·Uber ·26 DEC 2014
When Your Investor Becomes Your Biggest Competitor
The moment a board member starts leaving the room, the partnership is already over — the question is just who moves first.